IJIMS.2018.108

Type of Article: Original Research

Volume 5; Issue 4: 2018

Page No.: 613-618

DOI: 10.16965/ijims.2018.108

 

A STUDY ON CLASSIFICATION OF ACUTE LEUKAEMIAS ON THE BASIS OF CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES AND MOLECULAR GENETICS

S. Praveena *1, B Indusree 2.

*1 Assistant professor, Pathology Department, Dr. Patnam Mahender reddy institute of medical sciences and Hospital, Chevella, Rangareddy, Telangana, India.

2 Consultant Pathologist, Director, Shree Krishna Diagnostics, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Corresponding author: S. Praveena, Assistant professor, Pathology Department, Dr. Patnam Mahender reddy institute of medical sciences and Hospital, Chevella, Rangareddy, Telangana, India. E-Mail: praveena.bhushan@gmail.com

Abstract:

During the 25 months of study from August 2010 to September 2012 a total of 36 cases of leukaemias were studied in the Department of pathology, Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal in collaboration with Lifeline Diagnostics, Hyderabad. Out of 36 cases, 20 cases were AML, 15 cases were ALL and 1 case was mixed phenotypic acute leukaemia. The highest number of cases in the adults belonged to AML (16 cases). In children ALL (13cases) formed the majority of cases followed by AML (4 cases). Male: female ratio was 1.76:1. Fever (61.1%) was the most common presentation in the study population followed by splenomegaly (38.8%). Out of the AML cases studied, 13 cases were diagnosed by morphology alone and in 5 cases, cytogenetic study helped in sub typing the cases. Out of the ALL cases studied 5 cases were diagnosed by morphology alone and in 3 Cases, cytogenetic studies confirmed the diagnosis. MPO stain was done on all cases of acute leukaemias and (20 cases) out of these showed   positivity favoring a diagnosis of AML. PAS stain was done on all cases (7 cases) of which showed block positivity favoring a diagnosis of ALL. Immunophenotyping alone gave a definitive diagnosis in cases (25 cases). 1 case was diagnosed as mixed lineage acute leukaemia on Immunophenotyping which showed positivity for CD117, CD13, CD33, CD3, CD5. Only a total of 1 case failed on culture. Normal karyotying was seen in 26 cases. Cytogenetic studies helped in detecting other uncommon chromosomal abnormalities like hyper/hyperploids states which paved way for prognostication of the study population. FISH was done only in 3 cases.

Key words: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia, Acute Myeloid Leukaemia, Acute Myeloid Leukaemia-M4 Eosinophilic Variant, Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia.

REFERENCES

  1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. (December 2012). “Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010”. Lancet. 380(9859): 2095–128.
  2. Mathers, Colin D, Cynthia Boschi-Pinto, Alan D Lopez and Christopher JL Murray (2001). “Cancer incidence, mortality and survival by site for 14 regions of the world”(PDF). Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy Discussion Paper No. 13. World Health Organization.
  3. Greer John P, Baer Maria.R, Kinney Marsha.C, “Wintrobe’s Clinical Hematology.” 10th edition, Williams and Wilkins, volume 2, 1999, 2273.
  4. Redaelli A, Laskin BL, Stephens JM, Botteman MF, Pashos CL. A systematic literature review of the clinical and epidemiological burden of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2005;14(1):53-62.
  5. Catovsky Daniel, Hoff brand Victor A, “Acute Leukemia”, chapter 18 in Post graduate haematology. Hoffbrand Victor.A, Lewis Mitchell.S, Tuddenham Edward.G.D. Fourth edition, Butterworth – Heinemann international editions, 1999, 337- 385.
  6. Jean sparks, Aamir Ehsan, Shirlyn B.Mc Kenzie, “Clinical laboratory hematology.”1st edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004, 482-489.
  7. Kaushal, S., Sidhu, S.S., Anand, N., Patnaik, V.V.G., Singla, Rajan K. A study of chromosomal morphology in leukaemias. J Anat. Soc. India. 2001;50(2):112-8.
  8. Ghosh S, Shinde SC, Kumaran GS, Sapre RS, Dhond SR, Badrinath Y, et al. Haematologic and immunophenotypic profile of acute leukaemias: an experience at Tata Memorial Hospital Indian J Cancer. 2003;40(2):71-6.
  9. VinSheth FJ, Sheth JJ, Patel AI, Shah AD, Verhest A., Usefulness of cytogenetics in leukaemias. Indian J Cancer. 2002;39(4):139-42.
  10. Xiao R, Zhang R. Combined analysis of morphology, immunology, cytogenetics and Molecular biology (MICM) classification of 55 patients with Acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2004;12(2):147-50.
  11. Charrin c, J.P. Magaud, C. Sebban, D. Fiitre (Lyon; 72); N. Dastugue, F. Huguet-Rigal, et al. Cytogenetic abnormalities in acute lymphoblastic leukaemias. Collaborative study of the group m Francais de cytogenetique, haematologique. 1996;15;87(8):3135-42.
  12. Zheng J, Wang X, Hu Y, Yang J, Liu J, He Y, et al. A correlation study of immunophenotypic, cytogenetic and clinical features of 180 AML patients in China. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2008;74(1):25-9.

Download Full Text TOC