IJIMS.2015.124

Type of Article: Review

Volume 2; Issue 9 : September 2015

Page No.: 157-162

DOI: 10.16965/ijims.2015.124

 

A Review of Use of eLearning in Pharmacology

Ashwin Kamath.

Department of Pharmacology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.

CORRESPONDENCE:

Dr. Ashwin Kamath, Department of Pharmacology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. E-Mail: ashwin.kamath@manipal.edu

 

ABSTRACT

Teaching in pharmacology is predominantly lecture based. While practical sessions do include problem solving and case scenarios the teaching methodologies are inadequate in empowering the students to handle real life scenarios which require integration of theory and practice, application of knowledge and skills to find a viable solution to a defined problem. Use of elearning in such situations is still in its infancy in Indian medical colleges and thus provides a unique opportunity to improve the existing teaching and learning methods. This review will look into studies describing various forms of eLearning methodologies adopted for teaching pharmacology to health professionals as well as those which have tried to assess the effect of eLearning approach adopted in teaching pharmacology across the globe.

KEY WORDS: eLearning, Pharmacology, teaching, Lectures, Teaching methodologies.

REFERENCES

  1. Salient features of Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997 (Internet). 1997. Published in part iii, section 4 of the Gazette of India dated 17th May 1997. [http://www.mciindia.org/RulesandRegulations/GraduateMedicalEducationRegulations1997.aspx]
  2. Rangachari PK. Basic Sciences in an Integrated Medical Curriculum: The Case of Pharmacology. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1997;2(2):163-171.
  3. Upadhyaya P, Seth V, Sharma M, Ahmed M, Moghe VV, Khan ZY et al. Prescribing knowledge in the light of undergraduate clinical pharmacology and therapeutics teaching in India: views of first-year postgraduate students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2012 Jun 5;3:47-53.
  4. Galea V, Stewart T, Steel CH. Challenge FRAP: An e-learning tool used to scaffold authentic problem-solving processes. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. [http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/galea.pdf]
  5. Imperial College London, World Health Organization. eLearning for undergraduate health professional education: a systematic review informing a radical transformation of health workforce development. Jan 2015. [http://whoeducationguidelines.org/content/eLearning-report]
  6. Suarez-Kurtz G. Comments to the IUPHAR document on clinical pharmacology. World Health Organization. [http://www.who.int/selection_medicines/committees/expert/18/policy/Kurtz_Brazil_IUPHAR.pdf]
  7. Brain S, Dewhurst D, Williams A. Evaluation of the usefulness of a computer‐based learning program to support student learning in pharmacology. ALT-J. 1999;7:37–45.
  8. Dewhurst DG, Norris TAM. Helping teachers to embed e-learning materials into undergraduate pharmacology courses. Bioscience Education. 2003;1(1). DOI: 10.3108/beej.2003.01010006
  9. Efferth T. Ten Years’ Experience with an E-Learning Lecture Series on Cancer Biology and Pharmacology. Educ. Sci. 2013;3:1-16.
  10. Tse MM, Lo LW. A Web-based e-learning course: integration of pathophysiology into pharmacology. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(9):919-24.
  11. Franson KL, Dubois EA, de Kam ML, Cohen AF. Measuring learning from the TRC pharmacology E-Learning program. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;66(1):135-41.
  12. Samani K. Therapeutic drug monitoring: an e-learning resource. Bioscience Horizons. 2009;2(2):113-124.
  13. Kim PY, Allbritton DW , Keri RA , Mieyal JJ, Wilson-Delfosse AL. Participation in supplemental online pharmacology modules results in learning gains and student engagement [abstract]. Medical Science Educator 2010;20(2s).
  14. Baskett K. Using e-learning to improve prescribing practice in emerging prescribers. Teaching English with Technology – Special Issue on LAMS and Learning Design. 2011;11(1):98-109.
  15. Rosenbaum PE, Mikalsen O, Lygre H, Solheim E, Schjøtt J. A Blended Learning Course Design in Clinical Pharmacology for Post-graduate Dental Students. Open Dent J. 2012;6:182-7.
  16. Sucha M, Engelhardt S, Sarikas A. Internet discussion forums as part of a student-centred teaching concept of pharmacology. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2013;30(1):Doc2.
  17. Zollner B, Sucha M, Berg C, Muß N, Amann P, Amann-Neher B, Oestreicher D, Engelhardt S, Sarikas A. Pharmacases.de – a student-centered e-learning project of clinical pharmacology. Med Teach. 2013;35(3):251-3.
  18. Gaikwad N, Tankhiwale S. Interactive E-learning module in pharmacology: a pilot project at a rural medical college in India. Perspect Med Educ. 2014 Jan;3(1):15-30.
  19. Karaksha A, Grant G, Nirthanan SN, Davey AK, Anoopkumar-Dukie S. A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Educational Impact of E-Learning Tools on Griffith University Pharmacy Students’ Level of Understanding Using Bloom’s and SOLO Taxonomies. Education Research International. 2014;2014:1.
  20. E Hughes I. Computer-based learning–an aid to successful teaching of pharmacology? Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2002;366(1):77-82.
  21. Dewhurst D. Computer-based alternatives in higher education–past, present and future. ALTEX. 2006;23(3):197-201.
  22. Dewhurst DG, Hardcastle J, Hardcastle PT, Stuart E. Comparison of a computer simulation program and a traditional laboratory practical class for teaching the principles of intestinal absorption. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:S95-104.
  23. Dewhurst D. Computer-based alternatives to using animals in teaching physiology and pharmacology to undergraduate students. Altern Lab Anim. 2004 Jun;32 Suppl 1B:517-20.
  24. Dewhurst D. Is it possible to meet the learning objectives of undergraduate pharmacology classes with non-animal models? AATEX. 2008;14:207–12.
  25. Kuruvilla A, Ramalingam S, Bose AC, Shastri GV, Bhuvaneswari K, Amudha G. Use of computer assisted learning as an adjuvant to practical Pharmacology teaching: Advantages and limitations. Indian J Pharmacol. 2001;33:272–5.
  26. Badyal DK, Modgill V, Kaur J. Computer simulation models are implementable as replacements for animal experiments. Altern Lab Anim. 2009;37:191–5.
  27. Govindaraja C, Jaiprakash H, Annamalai C, Vedhavathy SS. Computer assisted learning : Perceptions and knowledge skills of undergraduate medical students in a Malaysian medical school.. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011;1(2):63-67.
  28. Leathard HL, Dewhurst DG. Comparison of cost effectiveness of a computer assisted learning program with tutored demonstration to teach intestinal motility to medical students. ALT-J. 1995;3:118–25.
  29. Wang L. Computer-simulated pharmacology experiments for undergraduate pharmacy students: Experience from an Australian university. Indian J Pharmacol. 2001;33:280–2.

 

Download Full Text TOC