https://imedsciences.com/ editor_ijims@hotmail.com
ISSN: 2394-4137 (E) 2394-6318 (P)

IJIMS.2019.111

Type of Article: Original Research

Volume 6; Issue 4: 2019

Page No.: 807-811

DOI: 10.16965/ijims.2019.111

A STUDY OF COMPARISON OF SUBTENON’S ANAESTHESIA WITH PERIBULBAR ANAESTHESIA IN MANUAL SMALL INCISION CATARACT SURGERY IN RIMS TEACHING HOSPITAL RAICHUR

H. Siddesh Kumar 1, Kavita Patil *2.

1 Associate professor, Department of Ophthalmology, RIMS, Raichur, Karnataka, India.

*2 Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Gulbarga Institute Of Medical Sciences, Karnataka, India.

Corresponding author: Dr. Kavita Patil, Professor,  Department of Ophthalmology, Gulbarga Institute Of Medical Sciences, Karnataka, India. E-Mail: drsiddesh@gmail.com, kavi3009@gmail.com

ABSTRACT:

Purpose: This study is being taken for comparing the efficacy and complications encountered between subtenon anaesthesia and peribulbar anaesthesia in manual small incision cataract surgery in RIMS teaching hospital Raichur.

Materials and Methods: This comparative study was done on 50 patients (group 1 subtenon anaesthesia (n=25) and group 2 peribulbar anaesthesia (n=25)) with senile cataractwith visual acuity CF/HMundergoing lens extraction by manual small incision cataract surgery with posterior chamber intra ocular lens implantation atin the Department of Ophthalmology, RIMS teaching hospital Raichur.

Results: 56% Subtenon’s anaesthesia group patients, and 32% Peribulbar anaesthesia group patients had no pain, when it compared it is statistically significant (0.048), 20% Subtenon’s anaesthesia group patients, and 64% Peribulbar anaesthesia group patients had no grade 0, when it compared it is statistically significant (0.004), and 20% Subtenon’s anaesthesia group patients, and 64% Peribulbar anaesthesia group patients had no grade 0, when it compared it is statistically significant (0.004).

Conclusion: Subtenon’s anaesthesia is a safe and effective substitute for preibulbar anaesthesia in Manualsmall incision cataract surgery.

Key words: Cataract surgery, Manualsmall incision cataract surgery, Subtenon’s anaesthesia and Preibulbar anaesthesia.

REFERENCES

  1. Parkar T, Gogate P, Deshpande M, Adenwala A, Maske A, Verappa K. Comparison of subtenon anaesthesia with peribulbar anaesthesia for manual small incision cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol.2005;53:255-9.
  2. Adekola OO, Aribaba OT, Musa K, Olatosi JO, Asiyanbi GK, Rotimi‑Samuel A, et al. Regional anesthesia for small incision cataract surgery: Comparison of subtenon and peribulbar block. J Clin Sci.2018;15:1‑
  3. Datta A, Ghosh K, Basu S. A Comparative eveluation of peribulbar, subtenon’s and topical anaesthesia. AIOC Proc. 2008;82.
  4. Ripart J, Lefrant J, Vivien B, Charavel P, Fabbroperay P, JaussaudA, Ophthalmic regional anaesthesia. Medial canthus episcleral (subtenon) anaesthesia is more efficient than peribulbar anaesthesia. Anaesthesiology.2000;92:1278-85.
  5. Matcha SC, Nandyala SKK, Murahari VK. Comparison of subtenon’s v/s peribulabar anesthesia in manual small incision cataract surgery cases. MRIMS J Health Sciences. 2015;3(1):68-70.

Download Full Text TOC